WHEB Commentary

5G and Sustainability

2019 is the year that mobile networks will start to install 5G infrastructure in earnest.  5G represents a quantum leap in the performance of mobile networks which will greatly enhance the opportunities for sustainability but which also carries with it substantial risks. 

Written by Head of Research Seb Beloe, this article appears in our latest Quarterly Report

What is 5G and how is it different to 4G?

5G mobile technology will provide the backbone for a step-change in the performance of mobile devices. The physical hardware uses different kinds of antennas and operates on different radio spectrum frequencies to 4G.  This enables ultrafast download speeds that are up to 100x faster than 4G. The technology also massively reduces latency and can connect many more devices to the internet[1].  Because 5G uses shorter wavelengths, antennas can be much smaller than existing antennas and are able to provide more precise directional control. As a result, one 5G base station can support over 1,000 more devices per meter than what is currently supported by 4G.

However, there are draw-backs with the new technology. One of these is that the super-high frequencies used by 5G only work if there’s a clear, direct line-of-sight between the antenna and the device receiving the signal.  Consequently, lots of small antennae will need to be deployed in and around infrastructure that require 5G connectivity such as buildings and roads.

How might 5G support a lower carbon, more sustainable society?

One of the appealing aspects of 5G is that it will allow increased access for mobile devices to streamed content. For example, 5G will enable an average user to download an 800MB movie in 1 second rather than the 43 seconds it currently takes with a good 4G connection[2]. While this may have advertisers salivating, the broader contribution this will make to a more sustainable economy is limited at best. However, there are other applications that will be enabled by 5G that will make a substantial contribution, in our view.

At the top of this list is probably the much-vaunted ‘internet of things’ (IoT) which essentially involves connecting up different types of infrastructure so that they can be used much more efficiently. This is already possible with 4G technologies but will be made much more powerful with 5G. Because systems equipped with IoT technology can sense and respond intelligently to changes in their environment, these systems only use the power and other resources that they need. This, along with the capacity to sense when maintenance is needed, can significantly reduce the resources required in everything from manufacturing industries, to public transport systems, through to collecting, cleaning and distributing potable water.

Also high on the list is the automation of vehicles. Automating passenger and freight vehicles is expected to have a significant positive impact on the safety of road transport[3]. An expected second order effect is a substantial ‘dematerialising’ of the transport sector as people increasingly purchase the service of road transport rather than owning their own car. In turn this will herald the emergence of super-efficient electric vehicles as operating costs and energy use become the sector’s defining metric.

What are likely to be the draw-backs

Energy use in telecoms infrastructure is already a major concern with some studies suggesting that the carbon footprint of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) is equivalent to the airline industry[4]. Given the higher density of devices that 5G will enable, it is likely that, seen in isolation, 5G will expand the carbon footprint of the sector. Such a narrow view misses two important points, however.

The first, as previously described, is that 5G will enable much greater efficiencies in the wider economy. A study by BT calculated that the sector (including through the deployment of 5G) could reduce CO2 emissions by 1.5 gigatonnes by 2030[5]. A figure that is nineteen times as large as the ICT sector’s own expected footprint in 2030 and over a third of the EU’s total emissions in 2012.

In addition, the sector itself is already highly focused on reducing its own energy consumption because of the cost and inconvenience (for example poor battery life) of efficiency limitations. Design parameters such as ‘bits per joule’ are already key metrics for wireless communication systems[6]. Improving efficiencies and sourcing low carbon power for data centres have been priorities for major ICT companies for many years. Apple’s entire operations including their data centres are already wholly powered by renewable energy[7].

Given the expected explosion in data volumes that 5G will enable, it is unlikely that greater efficiency on its own will be sufficient. New energy harvesting technologies that ‘scavenge’ energy from the local environment or even from radio frequency signals themselves, will be critical to ensuring that the billions of devices that make up the IoT can be powered renewably[8]. There will of course be other drawbacks around the technology. Not least of these will be the importance of data privacy and security. Issues that are already critical for the industry, but which will become even more important with the advent of 5G-enabled applications.

Current fund positioning

5G telecommunications technology is fundamentally an enabler of a wide variety of new products and services. Not all of these will be aligned with a lower carbon and more sustainable economy. Consequently, we do not view 5G technology per se as an area that is attractive from a positive impact point of view.  The fund does have some modest exposure to companies that supply and test the products and services that make up the infrastructure of the 5G network. This includes companies like TE Connectivity and National Instruments. In both cases, this is not the principle reason for investing in these companies as such activities remain relatively small parts of their operations.

The fund’s exposure is mostly to companies that provide products and services that are enabled by 5G technology, rather than those manufacturing or operating the infrastructure itself.  Here the thematic case is much stronger. We are optimistic about the significant health (from lower pollution) and resource efficiency benefits of automated road transport and invest in several businesses such as Aptiv, Littelfuse and WABCO that sell components which enable greater automation in vehicles.

Other areas of exposure include companies, such as Xylem, that sell equipment for water treatment and distribution including connected devices to improve the energy efficiency of these activities. The fund also owns companies that use similar technology to improve resource efficiency in manufacturing and logistics industries, such as Rockwell Automation and Kion.

It is still early days in the deployment of 5G telecommunications networks and there are still significant issues that need to be resolved. However, we are optimistic about the potential for the technology and, in our view, believe that it offers enormous opportunity to improve efficiency and cut waste across multiple sectors. And in the process, it will drive the development of a lower carbon and more sustainable economy.

[1] https://www.lifewire.com/5g-vs-4g-4156322

[2] https://www.techspot.com/article/1582-state-of-5g-wireless/

[3] https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.dot.gov/files/documents/13069a-ads2.0_090617_v9a_tag.pdf

[4] https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/sep/25/server-data-centre-emissions-air-travel-web-google-facebook-greenhouse-gas

[5] https://www.btplc.com/Purposefulbusiness/Ourapproach/Ourpolicies/ICT_Carbon_Reduction_EU.pdf

[6] Qingwing Wu et al. ‘An Overview of Sustainable Green 5G Networks’, IEEE Wireless Communications, September 2016

[7] https://www.apple.com/uk/newsroom/2018/04/apple-now-globally-powered-by-100-percent-renewable-energy/

[8] Op. Cit. 5

Recent posts

  • Glasgow, Greta and GFANZ
  • The role of home health in the pandemic and beyond
  • Gas prices, ‘greenflation’ and governmental gatherings
  • We’ve been warned – climate crisis and weak links in the supply chain
  • Is ESG a waste of time?
  • Code Red from the IPCC
  • Extreme weather – a wake-up call on climate mitigation and adaptation
  • The price of civilisation
  • Delivering carbon reductions – moving beyond the targets
  • Is Amazon really a sustainable investment?
  • Archive

  • November 2021 (1)
  • October 2021 (3)
  • September 2021 (1)
  • August 2021 (2)
  • July 2021 (3)
  • June 2021 (1)
  • May 2021 (1)
  • April 2021 (3)
  • March 2021 (1)
  • February 2021 (1)
  • January 2021 (3)
  • December 2020 (1)
  • November 2020 (2)
  • October 2020 (3)
  • September 2020 (1)
  • August 2020 (2)
  • July 2020 (3)
  • June 2020 (2)
  • May 2020 (1)
  • April 2020 (3)
  • March 2020 (1)
  • February 2020 (2)
  • January 2020 (1)
  • December 2019 (1)
  • November 2019 (2)
  • October 2019 (3)
  • September 2019 (1)
  • August 2019 (2)
  • July 2019 (3)
  • June 2019 (2)
  • May 2019 (3)
  • April 2019 (1)
  • March 2019 (1)
  • February 2019 (2)
  • January 2019 (3)
  • December 2018 (1)
  • November 2018 (2)
  • October 2018 (4)
  • September 2018 (2)
  • August 2018 (4)
  • July 2018 (1)
  • June 2018 (1)
  • May 2018 (1)
  • April 2018 (2)
  • March 2018 (2)
  • February 2018 (1)
  • January 2018 (1)
  • December 2017 (3)
  • November 2017 (1)
  • July 2017 (3)
  • June 2017 (1)
  • May 2017 (1)
  • April 2017 (1)
  • February 2017 (2)
  • November 2016 (1)
  • August 2016 (1)
  • July 2016 (1)
  • June 2016 (1)
  • May 2016 (1)
  • April 2016 (2)
  • February 2016 (1)
  • December 2015 (1)
  • November 2015 (3)
  • October 2015 (1)
  • September 2015 (1)
  • July 2015 (2)
  • April 2015 (2)
  • February 2015 (2)
  • December 2014 (2)
  • November 2014 (3)
  • October 2014 (4)
  • August 2014 (1)
  • July 2014 (3)
  • June 2014 (1)
  • April 2014 (2)
  • March 2014 (2)
  • February 2014 (3)
  • January 2014 (4)
  • December 2013 (4)
  • October 2013 (5)
  • September 2013 (3)
  • July 2013 (4)
  • June 2013 (2)
  • May 2013 (4)
  • April 2013 (2)
  • March 2013 (4)
  • February 2013 (6)
  • January 2013 (2)
  • December 2012 (3)
  • November 2012 (1)
  • October 2012 (4)
  • September 2012 (2)
  • August 2012 (1)
  • July 2012 (3)
  • June 2012 (3)
  • May 2012 (6)
  • April 2012 (4)
  • March 2012 (5)