WHEB Commentary

Ty Lee

From Just in Time to Just in Case


Since the invention of just-in-time manufacturing in the 1960s, companies have been pursuing ever greater efficiency in their supply chains. Consolidating suppliers is one of the most common ways to reduce supply chain costs and improve efficiency. However, the risks of doing so are often overlooked. Robustness and resilience can be sacrificed along the way in exchange of greater efficiency.

Trade tensions

This approach works just fine until it doesn’t. The looming problem first became apparent as the trade relationship between the US and China started to deteriorate in late 2018. China is known as the world’s factory. It accounts for 35% of global manufacturing output.[i] Many multinational companies rely on its well-developed network of suppliers to produce their products. The trade dispute between the US and China prompted many companies to reassess their sources of inputs. However, that is easier said than done. After all, China has become a dominant manufacturing force for a reason. It has built a very efficient supply chain ecosystem over the years. Its labour and talent pool is still very attractive to many companies.

As global trade relationships continued to deteriorate further, countries and companies began to realise how critical it was to develop more diversified supplier networks. Some were even thinking about uprooting their manufacturing facilities and moving to other countries. Japan has already announced that it will provide funding to help companies move manufacturing out of China. Toshiba and Komatsu have moved part of their component provision from China to Thailand, Mexico and Japan.[ii] The US government is also considering providing incentives for US companies to pull component sources out of China.

And then COVID-19

As companies were scrambling to restructure their supply networks to minimise the impact of trade tariffs, the COVID-19 pandemic hit the world. This time, the pandemic fully exposed the vulnerability of global logistics networks. 94% of Fortune 1000 companies saw supply chain disruption from COVID-19.[iii] Even global companies like Apple, Airbus and Hyundai encountered meaningful disruption in their supply chains. It once again highlighted the risk of overly-lean global supply systems.

‘Near-shoring’ supply chains

Businesses are rethinking their supply networks and looking to build flexibility and resilience to protect against future disruptions. In the second quarter of 2020, the topic of ‘supply chains’ was discussed on nearly 80% of all investment analyst calls within the industrial, consumer and tech hardware sectors[iv]. The specific theme of ‘near shoring’ – identifying supply chains that are domestic or regional – was mentioned on over 15% of these calls. More than three times the previous peak in 2013.

One of our investee companies, Premier Inc, is a case in point. Premier is a group purchasing organization in the US, which plays a unique role as a connection point between healthcare providers and suppliers. It has been helping its customers to diversify their sources of supplies for many years. However, personal protection equipment (PPE) products are still overwhelmingly sourced from outside the US with approximately 80% coming from China and Southeast Asia[v]. In response to COVID-19, Premier has started working with domestic PPE manufacturers to expand their production lines.

The issue has also attracted the attention of policy-makers. US Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden has expressed an ambition to rebuild the US supply network for critical medical supplies. The plan will provide incentives to create more resilient supply-chains by shifting production of a range of critical products back to the US. COVID-19 will, in our view, accelerate supply chain automation. Technologies such as the Internet of Things, robotics and artificial intelligence play a key role here. These technologies bring many benefits in manufacturing and warehouse automation. They provide higher productivity, improved safety, more efficient use of materials and more predictable quality.

Such automation technologies are particularly useful in the manufacturing and retail sectors given the spike of e-commerce in recent months. WHEB’s strategy holds a Japanese company called Keyence which provides sensors and machine vision systems for factory automation. We also hold two leading warehouse automation companies Daifuku and Kion. Their products improve logistics efficiency in factories and warehouses. They also help reduce energy consumption and improve employee safety.

This global pandemic calls for re-prioritising between supply chain resilience and efficiency. We do not believe these are necessarily mutually exclusive objectives. Technologies are now ready to offer solutions to strike a better balance between the two.

[i] McKinsey Global Institute
[ii] The Australian Financial Review
[iii] Fortune
[iv] Morgan Stanley
[v] Premier Inc.

Recent posts

  • Improving investor confidence in impact investment
  • Boohoo and the drunkard’s search for ESG meaning
  • A Tale of Two Revolutions
  • Addressing Ethnic and Racial Diversity
  • From Just in Time to Just in Case
  • Recovery plan for Europe…and the environment
  • How we plan to achieve net-zero carbon emissions
  • Noisy signals at the end of the Age of Oil
  • The first quarter of 2020 is now assured a place in financial markets history
  • What does Covid-19 mean for sustainability?
  • Archive

  • August 2020 (2)
  • July 2020 (3)
  • June 2020 (2)
  • May 2020 (1)
  • April 2020 (3)
  • March 2020 (1)
  • February 2020 (2)
  • January 2020 (1)
  • December 2019 (1)
  • November 2019 (2)
  • October 2019 (3)
  • September 2019 (1)
  • August 2019 (2)
  • July 2019 (3)
  • June 2019 (2)
  • May 2019 (3)
  • April 2019 (1)
  • March 2019 (1)
  • February 2019 (2)
  • January 2019 (3)
  • December 2018 (1)
  • November 2018 (2)
  • October 2018 (4)
  • September 2018 (2)
  • August 2018 (4)
  • July 2018 (1)
  • June 2018 (1)
  • May 2018 (1)
  • April 2018 (2)
  • March 2018 (2)
  • February 2018 (1)
  • January 2018 (1)
  • December 2017 (3)
  • November 2017 (1)
  • July 2017 (3)
  • June 2017 (1)
  • May 2017 (1)
  • April 2017 (1)
  • February 2017 (2)
  • November 2016 (1)
  • August 2016 (1)
  • July 2016 (1)
  • June 2016 (1)
  • May 2016 (1)
  • April 2016 (2)
  • February 2016 (1)
  • December 2015 (1)
  • November 2015 (3)
  • October 2015 (1)
  • September 2015 (1)
  • July 2015 (2)
  • April 2015 (2)
  • February 2015 (2)
  • December 2014 (2)
  • November 2014 (3)
  • October 2014 (4)
  • August 2014 (1)
  • July 2014 (3)
  • June 2014 (1)
  • April 2014 (2)
  • March 2014 (2)
  • February 2014 (3)
  • January 2014 (4)
  • December 2013 (4)
  • October 2013 (5)
  • September 2013 (3)
  • July 2013 (4)
  • June 2013 (2)
  • May 2013 (4)
  • April 2013 (2)
  • March 2013 (4)
  • February 2013 (6)
  • January 2013 (2)
  • December 2012 (3)
  • November 2012 (1)
  • October 2012 (4)
  • September 2012 (2)
  • August 2012 (1)
  • July 2012 (3)
  • June 2012 (3)
  • May 2012 (6)
  • April 2012 (4)
  • March 2012 (5)