It began just before the quarter started. A novel virus emerged in the historic Chinese regional city of Wuhan. That virus would be named COVID-19. It would deliver the worst global pandemic in modern history.
This article appears in our latest Quarterly Report.
The human toll of this disease is truly terrible.
Its impact on the global economy is also devastating. The ramifications will be felt for many years. As we at WHEB consider its impact on financial markets, there are four key observations to make.
First, this crisis has provoked a very sharp reversal in global equity markets. One of the strategy’s benchmarks, the MSCI World Index of stocks, fell 15.65% in the quarter. That is the 7th largest fall in that index’s history.
Second, this crisis is not just the economic disruption of the shutdown. Faced with a devastating drop in demand, the world’s major oil producers began a ferocious price war. The result was a drop in the oil price to $20.48 as at 31st March, a price not seen since 2002.
Third, the question is not simply whether a severe recession will result. Many commentators are predicting a depression, a more severe downturn than the global economy has seen since the second world war.
Fourth, is that this extreme challenge has prompted an extreme policy response. The scale of the monetary and fiscal stimulus enacted around the world is unparalleled. It may well be enough to prevent the depression that everyone fears.
In this context, the strategy has performed reasonably well during the crisis.
The quarterly drawdown of 14.58% was 0.85% better than the MSCI World. It was also 0.8% better than its other benchmark, the Investment Association Global Peer Group Median.
Our attribution analysis helps us to uncover some of the reasons why. These early stages of a new economic cycle favour some of our sustainability themes and provide challenges for others.
Thematic selection effect has been a positive
The largest positive contributor wasn’t even a single theme. We use the term “thematic selection effect” to measure the contribution of index stocks which are not included in our universe of sustainability stocks. It is imperfect, for reasons not worth discussing here. But it gives some indication of the effect of investing in stocks with a positive impact.
In the COVID-19 crisis, this has been a significant positive. The most important component has been avoiding energy and financial stocks. Even before this crisis, we of course think that fossil energy companies are facing an existential threat.
Of our active themes, Resource Efficiency was the best contributor. This consists largely of cyclical stocks, often manufacturers of physical equipment, known as “industrials”. We expected that they would find the crisis difficult, and they still may. But in this first period, they held up well.
The most likely explanation for this, as we see it, is in the style of companies we prefer. We look for high quality industrial companies with low levels of indebtedness. We use our analysis of their environmental, social and governance performance to help us find them.
The other of our two largest themes (alongside Resource Efficiency) is Health. The stocks in this theme help to manage and solve the crisis. They are also defensive, at a time when the equity market is reacting in fear.
An air pocket for the transport industry
By far the worst performing theme in the crash was Sustainable Transport. We have strong conviction in the transition to electric vehicles. We think this will happen sooner and in greater volumes than the market appreciates.
But the companies which will enable this transition are ultimately sensitive to overall global car volumes. The COVID-19 crash has had a devastating effect on new car buying. Much of the world cannot physically move to acquire a car. Even if they could, under the new economic uncertainty it is a major purchase which will often be delayed.
With our long-term lens, we look through this crisis to a recovery in car buying, which will be dominated by electric cars. So we will not be meaningfully reducing our exposure, even as the later parts of 2020 are certain to be painful for those companies.
Our attribution also showed a meaningful negative allocation effect from our preference for companies smaller than the index average. So we can say that, amongst smaller companies, our stocks were the right choice for this period.
The crisis has created a huge number of questions.
What impact will the crash have, in the short term? How are our companies suited to survive and thrive, in the medium term? And most importantly, what about the long term. Will there be societal and behavioural changes, which will alter the course of the sustainable transition?
In general, we think the case for companies benefitting and enabling this transition will be strengthened rather than weakened. We outline our reasons why in the companion piece in this review. But the first quarter of 2020 has certainly given us plenty to ponder.
 Based on midday close price for the FP WHEB Sustainability Fund, and end of day prices for the MSCI World and IA Global.