Skip to main content
Commentary Resource Efficiency

Electricity vs gas - The devil is in the details

DSC08197
gas vs electric 865X588#

There is always a lot of noise around clean energy policies.  Today’s politics is all slogans and soundbites, and clean energy is a frontline issue in the West’s culture wars.  We see this reflected in the share prices of the many of the companies in our environmental themes, which sometimes seem to act as barometers of pure sentiment, with little regard for underlying fundamentals.

But underneath the noise and headlines, the transition to a low carbon economy is in many ways a dry, technical and detailed affair.  Companies generally use technical specifications to reduce their carbon footprint.  Gains in efficiency and yield are generally measured in tiny increments.  And the details of how those noisy headline policies are actually implemented, can have profound implications.

A great example of this is in the current fight to electrify heat.  At the moment, space heating is still dominated by fossil fuels.  Systems for using coal and natural gas have been embedded for hundreds of years.  They have the advantages of incumbency, including perfected supply lines, and network effects.

But, the scientists on the electric heat side are catching up.  Heat pump technology, where heat is effectively conjured out of thin air, has moved on leaps and bounds in recent years.  We are big fans, with investee company Trane Technologies making the pumps themselves, and other holdings such as Infineon deeper into the value chain. 

Outside residential heating, things are moving on too.  The Electric Thermal Solutions division of portfolio company Spirax delivers ever-higher temperature, more consistent and more flexible electric heat, for all kinds of industrial uses.  So the range of applications where fossil fuels beat electricity for heat is shrinking fast.

There is, of course, another big advantage for electricity, in that its price will only fall in the long term.  In the last decade, the cost of solar power has fallen by around 80%1, and onshore wind, 40%2.  And this cost curve is still a long way from completion.

So why isn’t electric heat being adopted more quickly?  Well, one reason is that the playing field isn’t always level.  And this is a great example of a small detail that could really help to speed things up.

The key metric to understand this is the electricity-to-gas price ratio.  This is how much a unit of electric energy costs, relative to the same unit of energy provided by natural gas.  In most of Europe at least, natural gas is the leading fossil fuel source of energy, as coal has largely been phased out.

If the electricity-to-gas ratio is high, then the cost of switching to electric heat from natural gas will be high.  Too high, for example, to encourage consumers to make that switch to a heat pump.

But what determines what this ratio is?  Well, obviously there are some “natural” market features which determine the relative prices of the two sources.  Having abundant natural gas, or a very developed gas grid network, will make gas relatively cheaper.    This works the other way too, of course.  This is why WHEB is investing in companies that help build more green electricity, and a bigger and better grid, through holdings such as FirstSolar, Schneider Electric and TE Connectivity.

Crucially, there are market distortions which can also tip the scales one way or another.  In many countries with above-average electricity-to-gas ratios, such as Belgium, Germany and the UK, government policies, and taxes, can be the sand in the gears.

Many readers will be familiar with the concept of fossil fuel subsidies, which remain remarkably widespread even in rich countries.  These can be buried in the supply chain and in tax codes, or more visible in adjusting the price of fossil fuels.

Ironically, even some levies designed to boost low carbon alternatives can be part of the problem.  Here in the UK, for example, electricity generation is subject to carbon pricing, but no carbon taxes are applied to gas or oil for residential use.  And what’s worse, there are surcharges such as the Electricity Generator Levy and Feed-in Tariff charges, which are currently only applied to electricity bills.

With electric heat adoption trailing way behind decarbonisation targets, these anomalies haven’t gone unnoticed.  The power industry globally is pushing for a fairer share of the burden to fall on heat-generating fossil fuels.3

Where these anomalies arise, most governments will want to straighten them out. But, staying with the example of the UK, the noise now dominating the debate on heating is around the Winter Fuel Payment…. and whatever attention the price ratio had, has been lost.  Of course, the Winter Fuel Payment is a very worthy subsidy for the elderly to stay warm in winter… but it does unfortunately also benefit the entrenched dominant heat provider, fossil fuels. 

It also makes the decision to rebalance between electricity and gas that much more controversial.  But this remains another detail that will need to be fixed on the road to a low-carbon future.

 

 

Sign up here to receive our monthly and quarterly commentaries in your inbox.

 

 


1 https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2017/Nov/%20IRENA_Sharply_falling_costs_2017.pdf
2 https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2017/Nov/%20IRENA_Sharply_falling_costs_2017.pdf
https://www.ft.com/content/9092d563-320f-4dd2-b283-e8eb4a2a9298

 

Important Notices:
Risks include: the price of shares (“Shares”) in FP WHEB Sustainability Impact Fund, WHEB Sustainable Impact Fund or WHEB Environmental Impact Fund may increase or decrease and you may not get back the amount originally invested, for reasons including adverse market and foreign exchange rate movements. Past performance does not predict future returns. The Fund invests in equities and is exposed to price fluctuations in the equity markets, and focuses on investments in mid-sized companies in certain sectors so its performance may not correlate closely with the MSCI World Index (the benchmark). For full risks, please see fund prospectus on www.whebgroup.com

 

General: This information, its contents and any related communication (altogether, the “Information”) is issued by WHEB Asset Management LLP (“WHEB Asset Management”). It is intended for information purposes only and does not constitute or form part of any offer or invitation to buy or sell any security including any shares in the FP WHEB Sustainability Impact Fund or WHEB Sustainable Impact Fund, including in the United States. It should not be relied upon to make an investment decision in relation to Shares in the FP WHEB Sustainability Impact Fund or WHEB Sustainable Impact Fund or otherwise; any such investment decision should be made only on the basis of the Fund scheme documents and appropriate professional advice. This Information does not constitute advice of any kind, investment research or a research recommendation, is in summary form and is subject to change without notice. The performance shown does not take account of any commissions and costs charged when subscribing to and redeeming shares. WHEB Asset Management has exercised reasonable care in preparing this Information including using reliable sources, however, makes no representation or warranty relating to its accuracy, reliability or completeness or whether any future event may or may not occur. This Information is only made available to recipients who may lawfully receive it in accordance with applicable laws, regulations and rules and binding guidance of regulators. WHEB Asset Management LLP is registered in England and Wales with number OC 341489 and has its registered office at 7 Cavendish Square, London, W1G 0PE. WHEB Asset Management LLP is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority with Firm Reference Number 496413.

 

FP WHEB Sustainability Impact Fund

FundRock Partners Limited (formerly Fund Partners Limited) is the Authorised Corporate Director of the Fund and is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority with Firm Reference Number 469278 and has its registered office at 6th Floor Bastion House, 140 London Wall, London, EC2Y 5DN. The state of the origin of the Fund is England and Wales. The Representative in Switzerland is ACOLIN Fund Services AG, Leutschenbachstrasse 50, CH-8050 Zurich, whilst the Paying Agent is NPB Neue Privat Bank AG, Limmatquai 1/am Bellevue, P.O. Box, 8024 Zurich . The relevant documents such as the prospectus, the key investor information document (KIIDs), the Articles of Association as well as the annual and semi-annual reports may be obtained free of charge from the Representative in Switzerland.

 

WHEB Sustainable Impact Fund

The Manager of the Fund is FundRock Management Company S.A., authorised and regulated by the Luxembourg regulator to act as UCITS management company and has its registered office at 33, rue de Gasperich, L-5826 Hesperange, Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg. The Representative in Switzerland is ACOLIN Fund Services AG, Leutschenbachstrasse 50, CH-8050 Zurich, whilst the Paying Agent is NPB Neue Privat Bank AG, Limmatquai 1/am Bellevue, P.O. Box, 8024 Zurich. The relevant documents such as the prospectus, the key investor information document (KIIDs), the Articles of Association as well as the annual and semi-annual reports may be obtained free of charge from the representative in Switzerland. The state of the origin of the Fund is Ireland. The Fund is registered for distribution to professional investors in Austria, France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, Norway, Singapore, Sweden and the United Kingdom, and is registered for offering to retail investors in Switzerland, Denmark and the Netherlands. The Fund is also available for professional investors in Belgium and Hong Kong. It is not available to investors domiciled in the United States.

 

WHEB Environmental Impact Fund

The Manager of the Fund is FundRock Management Company S.A., authorised and regulated by the Luxembourg regulator to act as UCITS management company and has its registered office at 33, rue de Gasperich, L-5826 Hesperange, Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg. The Fund is registered for distribution to professional investors in the United Kingdom. It is not available to investors domiciled in the United States.

 

The MSCI information may only be used for your internal use, may not be reproduced or re-dissseminated in any form and may not be used as a basis for or a component of any financial instruments or products or indices. None of the MSCI information is intended to constitute investment advice or a recommendation to make (or refrain from making) any kind of investment decision and may not be relied on as such. Historical data and analysis should not be taken as an indication or guarantee of any future performance analysis, forecast or prediction. The MSCI information is provided on an “as is” basis and the user of this information assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. MSCI, each of its affiliates and each other person involved in or related to compiling, computing or creating any MSCI information (collectively, the “MSCI Parties”) expressly disclaims all warranties (including, without limitation, any warranties of originality, accuracy, completeness, timeliness, non-infringement, merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose) with respect to this information. Without limiting any of the foregoing, in no event shall any MSCI Party have any liability for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, punitive, consequential (including, without limitation, lost profits) or any other damages (www.msci.com).

Sign up to impact fund updates

Sign up below to receive email updates on our impact investment funds.
{{ errors[0] }}
{{ errors[0] }}
{{ errors[0] }}
{{ errors[0] }}
{{ errors[0] }}
{{ errors[0] }}
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority Copyright 2024© WHEB. All rights reserved Made by Thursday
How to invest