Skip to main content
Commentary Investor Contribution

Stewardship in the spotlight: The stewardship stampede

DSC08390
Stampede

Levels of stewardship activity have never been higher. Whilst by no means a new feature of the investment industry, in 2023 stewardship became a core activity for many asset managers and owners.

For sustainability investors, in the UK at least, the high profile for stewardship has been cemented by the FCA's Sustainability Disclosure Requirements (SDR). Published at the end of last year, this policy includes a notable focus on investor stewardship for all four of its labels1. Internationally, the Global Impact Investing Institute (GIIN) also recognises stewardship's role in impact investing.

Since 2022, UK Pension schemes with more than 100 members have been expected to state their – or their external managers’ – engagement policy and priorities and explain in detail how they steward their sustainable investments. This in turn has encouraged underlying asset managers to develop their own policies and systems to meet these expectations. It is perhaps no wonder then that the 2020 UK Stewardship Code continues to gain signatories. Up from 236 at the end of 2022, and now standing at 277, 68% of these are asset managers2.

Quantity over quality?

This new impetus for engagement is having an impact on the levels of engagement activity reported by asset managers. In a study by the investment consultants Redington, one asset manager reported that they had undertaken more than 10,000 engagement actions with the 2,000 companies that they own3. The report’s authors conclude that ‘not all engagement is created equal [and therefore], we can’t rely on the raw numbers to tell us what’s going on.’

In fact, prioritising quantity over quality very much seems to have been the reaction of much of the market. For example, in 2023 asset managers’ stewardship efforts came under fire on multiple fronts including misalignment with client values4; lack of consistency in voting activities5; low-quality efforts and under-resourcing6; and ineffective escalation7 to name a few.

Elsewhere in 2023, to combat greenwashing, some managers have tried to show proof of additionality or "engagement alpha", for example through joint statements between investors and even the companies themselves8.

While we don’t think this is the answer (or the best use of time), we do acknowledge what this, along with these other issues, is ultimately telling us: there is a lack of consensus on what ‘good’ investor stewardship looks like and how asset managers should manage, assess and report their activities.

Minding the gap

The good news, in our view, is that these issues represent ‘growing pains’. While there’s discomfort now, there lies an opportunity for the industry to learn from the pain points to build a collective understanding of what constitutes ‘good stewardship’ and strengthen practices.

WHEB’s approach to engagement and voting is well established9 and underpinned by extensive research, analysis, and policy development. Nonetheless, 2023 has still proven to be a foundational year for us as we have worked to elevate the overall quality of what we do. Predominantly, this work has comprised:

1.     Focusing on outcomes (not just activity) and how this links to long-term value creation

Ultimately, our company engagement activity is focused on encouraging companies to address issues that we think will help them be successful. Asset managers need, in our view, to demonstrate how their stewardship and engagement activity contributes to this long-term value creation. We will address how we select these issues in a future blog. 

We are clear though that outcomes are ultimately what matter. Reporting should therefore focus on achieving good outcomes, not just engagement activity. At the same time, we are careful about attributing outcomes specifically to our engagement, which we see as deeply problematic. Changes in company policy and performance are almost always the result of multiple efforts from a variety of stakeholders.

Nonetheless, it is possible to show a correlation. We believe this begins with a systematic approach to engagement (Figure 1), comprising:

1.     Identifying the issues on which to engage whether proactively or reactively (the ‘inputs’);

2.     Prioritising material issues and setting long-term objectives and relevant engagement milestones;

3.     ‘Engaging and voting’ (iteratively) to achieve progress against these milestones and feeding this back into our investment analysis which,

4.     along with our reporting of progress to clients and other stakeholders, represents our “Investor Contribution” to positive impact. 

Our work to address biodiversity across the portfolio, which we wrote about recently10, is an example of this approach in practice.

 

Figure 1. A systematic approach to managing company engagement

Screenshot 2024 01 24 140953

2.     How effective is our engagement?

We’ve also developed a more rigorous approach to assessing the effectiveness of our engagement. This involves setting specific outcome milestones for each engagement. These milestones start with the company acknowledging the issue and conclude with clear evidence that the issue is being effectively addressed, and are shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2: WHEB’s objective milestones

New Figure 2

During 2023 we reviewed our engagement activities over the past six years to identify the milestones that have been achieved over this period. Figure 3 shows how the overall amount of engagement has increased during this period, with a greater number of engagements initiated from 2020 – 2022. In turn, this has fed into a proportionally larger number of Milestone 1 (M1) and Milestone 2 (M2) outcomes.

As illustrated in Figure 2, we don’t expect every engagement to conclude with an M4 milestone, but with WHEB’s engagement objectives often targeting ambitious, long-term changes to strategy and policy, we hope that over time we will see an increase in Milestones 3 and 4 (M3, M4). We will be publishing more insights from this analysis in our forthcoming Stewardship Report.

Figure 3: Milestone progress 2018-2023

New Figure 3

3.     Making disclosures meaningful

We’ve previously written about11 our ‘radically transparent’ and comprehensive reporting, which extends to all of our engagement and voting work. Though serving as a form of assurance for our investors, we understand that this alone is not always helpful as navigating large volumes of data can be a challenge.

In our efforts to avoid both the ‘Scylla’ of cherry-picked anecdotes as well as the ‘Charybdis’ of meaningless data, we have developed complementary disclosures to evidence how our actions align with client priorities and values. We hope this makes them more meaningful. So far, efforts have centered around demonstrating overall progress on the highest priority issues. Figure 4, for example, shows how the biggest emitters of greenhouse gases (GHGs) in WHEB’s portfolio have changed their emissions between 2022 (dots) and 2023 (triangles), and also whether their approach to managing their emissions has become more or less aligned with the Paris Agreement.

Figure 4: WHEB’s investor contribution to progressing core sustainability issues

Alternative 4

Currently, we are working to develop this visualization tool further and to expand coverage to other key stewardship priorities such as gender diversity, biodiversity, and executive remuneration. 

Conclusions

Our ambition is to give our clients the tools to see how their investments with WHEB are helping to deliver positive change through the engagement work that we do. As we head into 2024, the ability of investment managers to successfully deliver on stewardship will, in our view, depend on considered, systematic stewardship processes, underpinned by robust systems, resources, and meaningful reporting.

 

Sign up here to recieve our monthly and quarterly commentaries in your inbox.

 

1 https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/policy/ps23-16.pdf
2 https://esgclarity.com/uk-stewardship-code-signatories-grow-to-277/
3 https://redington.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Redington-Stewardship-Code-reporting-FINAL.pdf
4 Hoepner, Andreas G. F., UK Asset Owner Stewardship Review 2023: Understanding the Degree & Distribution of Asset Manager Voting Alignment (November 17, 2023). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4643377 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4643377
5 https://www.responsible-investor.com/manager-inconsistency-on-stewardship-drives-growing-frustration-among-uk-asset-owners/
6 https://www.responsible-investor.com/under-resourced-and-ineffective-industry-leaders-deliver-gloomy-verdict-on-stewardship/
7 https://cdn2.assets-servd.host/shareaction-api/production/resources/reports/UNDER-EMBARGO-RISE-Paper-2_Introducing-a-standardised-framework-for-escalating-with-companies.pdf
8 https://www.responsible-investor.com/engagement-claims-without-additionality-pose-greenwash-risk-says-ca100-chair/
9 Stewardship has been a core aspect of our offering and we have been reporting on progress quarterly since 2016.
10 https://www.whebgroup.com/our-thoughts/stewardship-in-the-spotlight-nature-calls-from-assessment-to-action
11 https://www.whebgroup.com/our-thoughts/stewardship-in-the-spotlight-achieving-accountability-while-avoiding-engagement-washing

Important Notices:
Risks include: the price of shares (“Shares”) in FP WHEB Sustainability Fund, WHEB Sustainable Impact Fund or WHEB Environmental Impact Fund may increase or decrease and you may not get back the amount originally invested, for reasons including adverse market and foreign exchange rate movements. Past performance does not predict future returns. The Fund invests in equities and is exposed to price fluctuations in the equity markets, and focuses on investments in mid-sized companies in certain sectors so its performance may not correlate closely with the MSCI World Index (the benchmark). For full risks, please see fund prospectus on www.whebgroup.com

 

General: This information, its contents and any related communication (altogether, the “Information”) is issued by WHEB Asset Management LLP (“WHEB Asset Management”). It is intended for information purposes only and does not constitute or form part of any offer or invitation to buy or sell any security including any shares in the FP WHEB Sustainability Fund or WHEB Sustainable Impact Fund, including in the United States. It should not be relied upon to make an investment decision in relation to Shares in the FP WHEB Sustainability Fund or WHEB Sustainable Impact Fund or otherwise; any such investment decision should be made only on the basis of the Fund scheme documents and appropriate professional advice. This Information does not constitute advice of any kind, investment research or a research recommendation, is in summary form and is subject to change without notice. The performance shown does not take account of any commissions and costs charged when subscribing to and redeeming shares. WHEB Asset Management has exercised reasonable care in preparing this Information including using reliable sources, however, makes no representation or warranty relating to its accuracy, reliability or completeness or whether any future event may or may not occur. This Information is only made available to recipients who may lawfully receive it in accordance with applicable laws, regulations and rules and binding guidance of regulators. WHEB Asset Management LLP is registered in England and Wales with number OC 341489 and has its registered office at 7 Cavendish Square, London, W1G 0PE. WHEB Asset Management LLP is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority with Firm Reference Number 496413.

 

FP WHEB Sustainability Fund

FundRock Partners Limited (formerly Fund Partners Limited) is the Authorised Corporate Director of the Fund and is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority with Firm Reference Number 469278 and has its registered office at 6th Floor Bastion House, 140 London Wall, London, EC2Y 5DN. The state of the origin of the Fund is England and Wales. The Representative in Switzerland is ACOLIN Fund Services AG, Leutschenbachstrasse 50, CH-8050 Zurich, whilst the Paying Agent is NPB Neue Privat Bank AG, Limmatquai 1/am Bellevue, P.O. Box, 8024 Zurich . The relevant documents such as the prospectus, the key investor information document (KIIDs), the Articles of Association as well as the annual and semi-annual reports may be obtained free of charge from the Representative in Switzerland.

 

WHEB Sustainable Impact Fund

The Manager of the Fund is FundRock Management Company S.A., authorised and regulated by the Luxembourg regulator to act as UCITS management company and has its registered office at 33, rue de Gasperich, L-5826 Hesperange, Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg. The Representative in Switzerland is ACOLIN Fund Services AG, Leutschenbachstrasse 50, CH-8050 Zurich, whilst the Paying Agent is NPB Neue Privat Bank AG, Limmatquai 1/am Bellevue, P.O. Box, 8024 Zurich. The relevant documents such as the prospectus, the key investor information document (KIIDs), the Articles of Association as well as the annual and semi-annual reports may be obtained free of charge from the representative in Switzerland. The state of the origin of the Fund is Ireland. The Fund is registered for distribution to professional investors in Austria, France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, Norway, Singapore, Sweden and the United Kingdom, and is registered for offering to retail investors in Switzerland, Denmark and the Netherlands. The Fund is also available for professional investors in Belgium and Hong Kong. It is not available to investors domiciled in the United States.

 

WHEB Environmental Impact Fund

The Manager of the Fund is FundRock Management Company S.A., authorised and regulated by the Luxembourg regulator to act as UCITS management company and has its registered office at 33, rue de Gasperich, L-5826 Hesperange, Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg. The Fund is registered for distribution to professional investors in the United Kingdom. It is not available to investors domiciled in the United States.

 

The MSCI information may only be used for your internal use, may not be reproduced or re-dissseminated in any form and may not be used as a basis for or a component of any financial instruments or products or indices. None of the MSCI information is intended to constitute investment advice or a recommendation to make (or refrain from making) any kind of investment decision and may not be relied on as such. Historical data and analysis should not be taken as an indication or guarantee of any future performance analysis, forecast or prediction. The MSCI information is provided on an “as is” basis and the user of this information assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. MSCI, each of its affiliates and each other person involved in or related to compiling, computing or creating any MSCI information (collectively, the “MSCI Parties”) expressly disclaims all warranties (including, without limitation, any warranties of originality, accuracy, completeness, timeliness, non-infringement, merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose) with respect to this information. Without limiting any of the foregoing, in no event shall any MSCI Party have any liability for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, punitive, consequential (including, without limitation, lost profits) or any other damages (www.msci.com).

Sign up to impact fund updates

Sign up below to receive email updates on our impact investment funds.
{{ errors[0] }}
{{ errors[0] }}
{{ errors[0] }}
{{ errors[0] }}
{{ errors[0] }}
{{ errors[0] }}
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority Copyright 2024© WHEB. All rights reserved Made by Thursday
How to invest